ksmarttray: keep in contrib or split out into own tarball?

[Axel Thimm]

Hi again,

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:58:05PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> some time ago (~0.35 ?) it was suggested to break out ksmarttray of
> smart's distribution and place it into it's own tarball.
> 
> The reasons for doing so are that ksmarttray is rather stable (only
> recently there was a patch since early 0.3x days), and that it carries
> a huge bag of build requirements.
> 
> Would that still make sense, or is it better left in smart's tarball?
> I'm not really pushing towards either, just want to have a mid term
> packaging plan :)

no feedback? Maybe I should simply subpackage ksmarttray again as part
of smart and version it accordingly.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.labix.org/pipermail/smart-labix.org/attachments/20060804/a45a7ab6/attachment-0002.pgp>