GPG-pubkeys

[Basil Chupin]

Christoph Thiel wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Basil Chupin wrote:
> 
>> I don't remember having to accept a gpg-key from each and every source 
>> of upgrades for my OS (SUSE) but only 2 or possibly 3 sites had to have 
>> their gpgs accepted or rejected (but who in their right mind would do 
>> that anyway?). So, what is the big deal about these gpg-keys when they 
>> are not universally used?
> 
> That's because we only have 2 major keys for SUSE / openSUSE -- one for 
> the distribution and the other one for the Build Service.

Ok, so what you seem to be suggesting is that I would have had to 
manually accept those keys at some early stage before smart did any 
upgrading from these sources and now the upgrades are done without me 
being questioned about the gpgs?

At the same time, are these same keys used by all the mirrors which are 
listed in smart's list of mirrors used for upgrading?

Cheers.

-- 
This computer is environment-friendly and is running on OpenSuSE 10.1