Distributions going smart & bugfixes?

[Jeff Johnson]

On Jan 8, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:

>
> I agree about the opal issue, but I think rpm dependency loops are not
> a bug per se, but AFAIK even a planned feature from the beginning. The
> "loops" are considered to be packages that can only be installed
> together.


rpm (in fact) exited with an error when any loop was encountered.

So "from the beginning" dependency loops cased full failure  
installation stop.

Presumably the Greek Bible has lost something in translation.

73 de Jeff


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4664 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.labix.org/pipermail/smart-labix.org/attachments/20090109/3ad5ad98/attachment-0003.bin>