<div dir="ltr"><div>Solved! I uninstalled the packages in conflict and Smart is working well!<br><br></div>Thanks,<br><br>FraterLinux<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-31 19:06 GMT-03:00 Frater AEC <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:frateraec@gmail.com" target="_blank">frateraec@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><span class=""><div>Anders wrote:</div><div>><br>>I don't see what the conflicting files have to do with a rolling release...</div><div>><br></div><div>>You mean that the packages are broken more often, because of the lack of release management ?</div>
<div>><br></div></span><div><span class="">>Or that it needs to be more bug-compatible with apt-rpm, to support whatever it is PCLOS is doing ?<br><br></span><span lang="en"><span>The number of</span> <span>updated packages</span> <span>is different</span> <span>with the commands</span> <span>"</span><span>apt</span><span>-get</span> <span>--upgrade</span><span>"</span> <span>and</span> <span>"</span><span>apt</span><span>-get</span> <span>--dist-upgrade</span><span></span><span>"</span><span>.</span> <span>In practical</span> <span>terms</span><span>,</span> <span>depending on the amount</span> <span>of</span> <span>updated packages</span><span>,</span> "<span>smart</span> <span>--upgrade"</span> <span>does not solves all dependencies</span> <span>and</span> "<span>apt</span><span>-get</span> --dist-<span>upgrade</span>"<span></span> <span>solves</span><span>.</span></span> <br>
<div><div><div style="display:inline-block"><div><span></span></div></div></div></div>   <div><div dir="ltr" style="zoom:1">
<span lang="en"><span>This problem</span> <span>should</span> <span>not</span> <span>occur.</span> <span>What is the difference</span> <span>in</span> <span>treatment</span> <span>rpm</span> <span>dependencies</span> <span></span></span><span lang="en"><span><span lang="en"><span>between</span></span></span> <span>"</span><span>apt</span><span>-get</span> <span></span></span><span lang="en"><span><span lang="en"><span>--dist</span><span>-</span></span>upgrade</span><span></span><span>"</span> <span>and</span> <span>"</span><span>smart</span> <span>--upgrade</span><span>"</span><span>?<br>
<br></span></span></div><div><span lang="en"><span>Thanks,<br><br></span></span></div><div><span lang="en"><span>FraterLinux<br></span></span></div>
</div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-08-31 15:56 GMT-03:00 Anders F Björklund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:afb@algonet.se" target="_blank">afb@algonet.se</a>></span>:<div><div class="h5"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div><div>Frater AEC wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">
<div><span><font color="#888888">   </font></span><span lang="en"><span>I understand</span> <span>the questions raised</span><span>.</span> <br>
<br><span>   I</span> <span>would like to ask</span><span>, what is the</span> <span>equivalent in the</span> <span>Smart</span> <span>for apt-</span><span>rpm</span> <span>--dist</span><span>-upgrade</span> <span>command</span><span>?<br>
</span></span></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>smart upgrade</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><span lang="en"><span>   </span></span><span lang="en"><span>If not,</span> <span>could</span> <span>be</span></span><span lang="en"><span><span lang="en"><span> requested</span></span> as</span> <span>a future</span> <span>implementation</span> <span>to</span> <span>--dist</span><span>-upgrade</span> <span>option to allow</span> <span>proper operation</span> <span>in</span> <span>rolling</span> <span>release</span> <span>distro</span> <span>like</span> <span>pclos</span><span>?<br>
</span></span></div></div></blockquote></div></div><br><div>I don't see what the conflicting files have to do with a rolling release...</div><div><br></div><div>You mean that the packages are broken more often, because of the lack of release management ?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Or that it needs to be more bug-compatible with apt-rpm, to support whatever it is PCLOS is doing ?</div><span><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>--anders</div><div><br></div></font></span></div>
</blockquote></div></div></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>