F***in' annoying unavailable keys...

Monkey 9 monkey9 at iae.nl
Sun Sep 3 11:48:31 PDT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Mauricio Teixeira (netmask) wrote:
>>> Em Dom, 2006-09-03 às 07:36 -0500, Richard Hendershot escreveu:
>>>
>>>> I'm unable to help since I use Fedora.  I see that apt-deb (Suse is
>>>> debian, right?) has a fingerprint channel attribute.  There may be
>>> Plain wrong. SUSE is SUSE. And if mean that it uses deb packages, wrong
>>> again, it uses RPM (and the official package manager is YaST).
> 
> Right, SUSE is an RPM based distribution, just like Fedora.
> 
>>> BTW, the GPG key is an attribute from the RPM package, not the channel.
>>> I don't know if 'rug' (Fedora?) handles it, but I'm pretty sure apt-rpm
>>> and (now) smart (will) support it.
> 
> Fedora uses yum.
> 
> rug comes from Red Carpet that comes from Ximian (now Novell).
> rug is and has always been rpm based.
> 
>>> An immediate solution would be:
>>>
>>> smart --set rpm-check-signatures=False
>>>
>>> This will disable the signature checking if you need it before the real
>>> issue is solved.
> 
> Right. Signature checking has been enabled in smart RPMs for SUSE Linux
> since 0.42-4.guru as far as my SUSE smart builds are concerned.
> You can see that from
>  rpm -q --changelog smart | less
> (press q to exit "less")
> 
> The command as above will disable signature checking, which will result
> in the same behavior as before.

Hmmmm...... :)

M9.
> 
> cheers
> --
>   -o) Pascal Bleser     http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/
>   /\\ <pascal.bleser at skynet.be>       <guru at unixtech.be>
>  _\_v The more things change, the more they stay insane.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE+yN/X5/X5X6LpDgRAuA9AKDLgwb8CLj3uHW2oMwrxKsC+0JfTACeLSfT
K+57HVYXfY2gpVhE4eSOLlU=
=cXog
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Smart mailing list