bizarre multi-arch error

[Neal Becker]

On Tuesday 13 February 2007, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> > What?!? Install a i386 package to satisfy x86_64 requirements?? That's
> > clearly wrong.
>
> If package A has a dependency on D and package B provides D, and
> package A and B are both installable, there's nothing wrong in
> satisfying one with the other, from a dependency solver point
> of view.

Even if it's the wrong arch?